Log in

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All submissions are initially assessed by the Editor-in-Chief, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer review.

The journal operates a double-blind evaluation process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief.

 

Section Policies